"Bypassing" means everything i say,you agree with me but when you will speak , i will bypass it by saying something contradictory and if i can't find contradictory ,then i will just dilute it by saying something irrelevant till you lose your energy and shut up.

So if i say trump is president,then you agree with me. But if you say trump is president,then i will say he is tyrrant and i can't believe you support a tyrrant. By calling trump a tyrrant,i bypassed your original argument and anything that comes after it.

Here what i am doing is maintaing one side narrative control and not letting you put your points and agreeing with anything you say.

While it doesn't work on formal setup infront of mature people , it works when its one on one conversation and when you don't have energy and time or when public is immature and think "saying something at the end means winning the argument"